[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111114215122.GC2250@minipsycho>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:51:23 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
shemminger@...tta.com, fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
tgraf@...radead.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, mirqus@...il.com,
kaber@...sh.net, greearb@...delatech.com, jesse@...ira.com,
fbl@...hat.com, benjamin.poirier@...il.com, jzupka@...hat.com,
ivecera@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next V8] net: introduce ethernet teaming device
Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:40:52PM CET, rick.jones2@...com wrote:
>On 11/12/2011 12:16 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>This patch introduces new network device called team. It supposes to be
>>very fast, simple, userspace-driven alternative to existing bonding
>>driver.
>
>What is the definition of "very" here - relative to bonding I
>presume? Are there actual performance figures available at this
>point? Something along the lines of test through both on the same
>hardware. I don't have HW on which to run myself but would be quite
>happy to help with say netperf command selection to demonstrate the
>difference between the two.
Rick, I will provide this.
But the simple fact how bond and team path differ suggests the results.
Stay tuned.
Jirka
>
>happy benchmrking,
>
>rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists