[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC2BC6D.9000304@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:24:29 +0100
From: Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
CC: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: Don't allow mode change via sysfs with slaves
present
Le 15/11/2011 18:00, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>> When changing mode via bonding's sysfs, the slaves are not initialized
>> correctly. Forbid to change modes with slaves present to ensure that every
>> slave is initialized correctly via bond_enslave().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico<vfalico@...hat.com>
>
> Looks good. This behavior forces someone who wants to change to mode to
> go through steps that are almost as destructive as when module options
> are used to configure the mode. I do not see a problem with this.
Except the fact that is enforce one more constraint on the exact order one should write into sysfs
to setup a bonding interface. We already have many such constraints and probably don't need more.
Currently, it is possible to enslave slaves before selecting the mode. The ifenslave-2.6 package
from Debian currently enslave slaves before setting the mode and would break with this change.
NAK.
Nicolas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists