[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111118.203732.971277374822526847.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:37:32 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: stephen.hemminger@...tta.com
Cc: jesse@...ira.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: Add Open vSwitch kernel components.
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:09:17 -0800 (PST)
>
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Stephen Hemminger
>> <shemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:12:18 -0800
>> > Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> + write_seqcount_begin(&stats->seqlock);
>> >> + stats->tx_packets++;
>> >> + stats->tx_bytes += sent;
>> >> + write_seqcount_end(&stats->seqlock);
>> >
>> > There is a u64_stats_sync set of macros for this. It has the
>> > advantage of becoming a NOP on 64 bit platforms.
>>
>> The reason why I did it this way is it ties the packet and byte count
>> together.
>
> Ok, but why bother?
> No other software counters bother to group bytes/packets. Even
> hardware counters get read separately.
Agreed, this is totally pointless. Please use the u64 state interfaces.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists