netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] netfilter: IPv6 NAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ECA83D8.6050309@trash.net>
Date:	Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:01:12 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
CC:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ulrich.weber@...hos.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] netfilter: IPv6 NAT

On 11/21/2011 02:05 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Monday 2011-11-21 06:45, kaber@...sh.net wrote:
>
>> net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_REDIRECT.c                  |   23 +-
>> .../{nf_nat_standalone.c =>  iptable_nat.c}         |  265 ++++-----
>> net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_irc.c                    |    4 +-
>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c                   |  119 +++--
> Pablo once hinted that the patches (and not just the diffstat) should
> also be produced using move semantics rather than the delete-add cycle,
> for the reader's benefit. To do this, so I have found, one can use
>
>   git send-email ... --format-patch -M

Yeah, I didn't use -M this time so people can test the patches
by applying them directly. I'll add it during the next submission
after setting up a public git tree.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html