[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111121075621.GF20943@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:56:21 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: gaofeng@...fujitsu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ipv4: Fix pmtu propagating
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 01:08:51PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:33:02PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:19:50 -0500 (EST)
> >
> > > I suspect that your real problem has nothing to do with UDP or RAW,
> > > but rather the issue is that entries already in the routing cache
> > > with a NULL peer need to be refreshed with peer information created
> > > in another context.
>
> Yes, that's the problem.
>
> >
> > So you want something like this patch:
> >
>
> Originally, I wanted to fix it with the patch below.
>
> Given the fact that dst->obsolete is not null, this should
> do the same like your patch for output routes. During the
> tests with this patch I noticed a problem with that.
> Unfortunately I can't remember what it was...
>
> I'll do some investigating, perhaps I can get it back to my mind.
>
> I did some quick tests with this and with your patch and both
> seem to fix the problem at the first glance.
>
I still don't see any problems with both of the patches.
So I assume that both patches would fix the issue. However,
your patch is probaply less fragile as this does not depend
on a certain value of dst->obsolete.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists