[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111123.160143.58902472755124590.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:01:43 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gdfuego@...il.com
Cc: richard.weinberger@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Finding a hidden bound TCP socket
From: "G. D. Fuego" <gdfuego@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:27:33 -0500
> Any comments? The behavior seems broken. At the very least its very
> inconsistent with other Unixes.
Until the socket has a full final tuple it is bound to, there is no
reason to list it.
No UNIX lists a socket which is partially bound and hasn't either
performed a listen() or a connect().
Nobody has any comments because nobody thinks it's worth worrying about.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists