[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322017644.2039.57.camel@mojatatu>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:07:24 -0500
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: Add Open vSwitch kernel components.
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 18:30 -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> He is pushing and popping entire tags off 802.1Q for now but
> you can easily imagine MPLS tags and all sorts of other things
> people will _need_.
Lots of packet munging already happening with actions.
We can pedit/nat/iptables/checksum/etc/. Works very well.
> Do we want tc and likely the skbedit action to explode into a
> packet mangling tool?
skbedit is the wrong action to use. I would write one with
a cutnpaste of the code they have to do vlan manipulation.
> Would it make sense to plug into ebtables
> perhaps with a new family, NFPROTO_OPENFLOW or even on the
> existing NFPROTO_BRIDGE.
There is _nothing_ that openflow needs that cant be done
in classifier-action piece.
A good number of the actions they need exist already.
> Although doing it with classifiers and more actions would flush
> out that TODO in act_mirred, and get us an mq_ingress among
> other things.
The packet redirect to user space is achieveable in many other
ways, thats why it was not added.
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists