netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netem: rate-latency extension

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111124200650.c1f609ef.billfink@mindspring.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:06:50 -0500
From:	Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
To:	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netem: rate-latency extension

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:

> * Eric Dumazet | 2011-11-24 23:14:58 [+0100]:
> 
> >Only point is why you chose ratelatency instead of rate ?
> 
> 
> Not sure why, it was called rate in v1, then somebody said ratelatency and I
> found it more stating. So in v2 it become ratelatency. I have no strong
> opinion here - should I generate v3?

>From the user perspective, I also find rate much more natural.
No need to add further to tc obscurity.

I would ask for an update to the netem man page, but I guess
there isn't a netem man page.  :-(

					-Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html