[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111125120218.GB2810@hell>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:02:18 +0100
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netem: rate-latency extension
* Eric Dumazet | 2011-11-25 07:13:20 [+0100]:
>Yes, but Hagen change adds a few lines to netem, and netem already
>handles throttling. This is why I believe its a nice enhancement.
We first modified TBF, but TBF address a slightly different task. So the patch
was a little bit awkward and complex (more awkward then the two additional
netem enqueue() lines). So in the end: yes, netem is the right place for this:
only a few lines in netem are required. Additionally: setup a qdisc chain with
TBF, netem, ... is also error prone. Students of mine repeatedly make mistakes
here. This change make a complete emulation setup even more easy. But this is
only a side note.
Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists