[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6D8AEE6@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:34:21 -0000
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: "Hagen Paul Pfeifer" <hagen@...u.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH iproute2 1/2] utils: add s32 parser
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger@...tta.com]
> "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:
>
> > > + res = strtoul(arg, &ptr, base);
> > > + if (!ptr || ptr == arg || *ptr || res > INT32_MAX || res <
> > INT32_MIN)
> >
> > No need to check !ptr.
>
> Also don't you want signed value? Reading strtol() man page,
> the correct way is:
> errno = 0;
> res = strtol(arg, &ptr, base);
> if (ptr == arg || errno)
> return -1;
>
> "RETURN VALUE
> The strtol() function returns the result of the conversion,
unless the
> value would underflow or overflow. If an underflow occurs,
strtol()
> returns LONG_MIN. If an overflow occurs, strtol() returns
LONG_MAX.
> In both cases, errno is set to ERANGE. Precisely the same
holds for
> strtoll() (with LLONG_MIN and LLONG_MAX instead of
LONG_MIN and
> LONG_MAX).
If you are that worried about numeric overflow (IIRC) you have
have to check the result for LONG_MIN/MAX (etc) before looking
at errno.
strtoul() is defined to support -ve values, and I think the
C rules for conversion between signed and unsigned ints
DTRT even for non 2's compliment systems.
Some of these bound checks are a waste of time.
The SUS doesn't require standard utilities to perform them.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists