[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322381248.2826.1.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 09:07:28 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dean Nelson <dnelson@...hat.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/62] net: remove the second argument of
k[un]map_atomic()
Le dimanche 27 novembre 2011 à 13:27 +0800, Cong Wang a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index cf480b5..b194beb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -3878,11 +3878,9 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> if (length <= copybreak &&
> skb_tailroom(skb) >= length) {
> u8 *vaddr;
> - vaddr = kmap_atomic(buffer_info->page,
> - KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> + vaddr = kmap_atomic(buffer_info->page);
> memcpy(skb_tail_pointer(skb), vaddr, length);
> - kunmap_atomic(vaddr,
> - KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> + kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
> /* re-use the page, so don't erase
> * buffer_info->page */
> skb_put(skb, length);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index a855db1..8603c87 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -1272,9 +1272,9 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq_ps(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> */
> dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&pdev->dev, ps_page->dma,
> PAGE_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> - vaddr = kmap_atomic(ps_page->page, KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> + vaddr = kmap_atomic(ps_page->page);
> memcpy(skb_tail_pointer(skb), vaddr, l1);
> - kunmap_atomic(vaddr, KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> + kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
> dma_sync_single_for_device(&pdev->dev, ps_page->dma,
> PAGE_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> @@ -1465,12 +1465,10 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> if (length <= copybreak &&
> skb_tailroom(skb) >= length) {
> u8 *vaddr;
> - vaddr = kmap_atomic(buffer_info->page,
> - KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> + vaddr = kmap_atomic(buffer_info->page);
> memcpy(skb_tail_pointer(skb), vaddr,
> length);
> - kunmap_atomic(vaddr,
> - KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> + kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
> /* re-use the page, so don't erase
> * buffer_info->page */
> skb_put(skb, length);
But why are these drivers using kmap_atomic() in first place, since
their fragments are allocated in regular zone (GFP_ATOMIC or
GFP_KERNEL) ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists