netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: tcp_sendmsg() wrong access to sk_route

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1322501577.2024.34.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date:	Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:32:57 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: tcp_sendmsg() wrong access to
 sk_route_caps

On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 17:20 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 08:54 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Perhaps a checkpatch warning should be issued
> > when the implicit cast [to bool] is used.
> checkpatch can't do type-checking; maybe you mean sparse.

I think I could get checkpatch to track the bool
type implicit casts for the not struct member
uses of bool.

ie:
	bool foo;
	[...]
	foo = expr;
but not:
	struct foo {
		bool bar;
	};
	[...]
	foo.bar = expr;

It's pretty trivial to do it mostly correctly
with spatch/cocci though.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html