[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E7586A7435D@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:52:31 +0000
From: "Fischer, Anna" <anna.fischer@...com>
To: Ben Pfaff <blp@...ira.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [GIT PULL v2] Open vSwitch
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [GIT PULL v2] Open vSwitch
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 01:54:16PM +0000, Fischer, Anna wrote:
> > Yes, I mentioned this months ago, and I am surprised this critical
> > issue has never been picked up on and addressed. With a flaw like
> this
> > there is no chance this component can be used in any serious
> > virtualization deployment where different customers share the same
> > physical server.
>
> It was addressed, by introducing additional queues and using them in
> userspace.
>
> This is documented in NEWS:
>
> - Flow setups are now processed in a round-robin manner across
> ports
> to prevent any single client from monopolizing the CPU and
> conducting
> a denial of service attack.
OK, that addresses my point, thanks. Ideally there should be smarter or more flexible algorithms than just a round robin scheduler, but it is a start.
Anna
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists