[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111128233004.GH3045@nuttenaction>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:30:04 +0100
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] netem: add cell concept to simulate
special MAC behavior
* Eric Dumazet | 2011-11-29 00:01:07 [+0100]:
>> -static psched_time_t packet_len_2_sched_time(unsigned int len, u32 rate)
>> +static psched_time_t packet_len_2_sched_time(unsigned int len,
>> + struct netem_sched_data *q)
>> {
>> - return PSCHED_NS2TICKS((u64)len * NSEC_PER_SEC / rate);
>> + len += q->packet_overhead;
>> +
>> + if (q->cell_size) {
>> + u32 carry = len % q->cell_size;
>> + len += carry;
>
>I dont understand this part (len += carry;)
Say the original packet is 100 byte, cellsize is 40 byte: three full size link
layer frames are required: 40 + 40 + 40 == 100 + 20. This is used for TDMA,
ATM or slot schemes where the remainder cannot be used.
Later in code carry is reused if cell overhead is configured.
>Also you use a lot of divides... Probably OK for netem...
I know, but
1) the branch is not hot (not taken at all if rate is not called)
2) cell_size could not restricted to a power of two - so I saw no real
optimization potential.
Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists