[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111129130137.000009ce@unknown>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:01:37 -0800
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] e1000e: Support for byte queue limits
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:33:16 -0800
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
> Changes to e1000e to use byte queue limits.
First: thanks Tom for looking into e1000e with this work.
> @@ -1096,6 +1097,10 @@ static bool e1000_clean_tx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> if (cleaned) {
> total_tx_packets += buffer_info->segs;
> total_tx_bytes += buffer_info->bytecount;
> + if (buffer_info->skb) {
> + bytes_compl += buffer_info->skb->len;
whats wrong with using total_tx_bytes or buffer_info->bytecount? it
contains the "bytes on the wire" value which will be slightly larger
than skb->len, but avoids warming the skb->len cacheline unnecessarily.
the rest of the patch to e1000e looks okay.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists