[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fba9911084786bf04747c0350e774615.squirrel@kondor.etf.bg.ac.rs>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:03:03 +0100
From: "Igor Maravić" <igorm@....rs>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: igorm@....rs, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netstamp_needed shouldn't be jump_label_key
>
> Could you test following patch ?
>
I've just put it to compile. I'l let you know soon as it finishes compiling.
I have one proposition for your patch. To put WARN_ON before in ifdef endif,
because we don't needed if we don't have HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, and also to check it
before using jump_label_dec.
Also I have few questions :)
First - why can't we use spin_lock on jump_label?
I know that You said that is because we are using mutex_lock in
arch_jump_label_transform() or text_poke_smp(), but I don't see why couldn't
we use mutex_lock inside spin_lock.
To me using spin_lock_irqsave and spin_lock_irqrestore does sound like as most logical solution.
With that lock, we would be sure that our mutex_lock in arch_jump_label_transform() or text_poke_smp()
isn't going to be interrupted.
Please correct if I'm wrong.
Also I saw that you put calling of net_enable_timestamp outside of spin_lock_bh
Why?
BR
Igor
[PATCH 1/1] jump_label warning if_interrupt
Move warning on the top of function net_enable_timestamp,
so we would be also warn if we are going to jump_label_dec in interrupt
Signed-off-by: Igor Maravic <igorm@....rs>
:100644 100644 45eab03... ef23cf7... M net/core/dev.c
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 45eab03..ef23cf7 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1453,6 +1453,7 @@ void net_enable_timestamp(void)
{
#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
int deferred = atomic_xchg(&netstamp_needed_deferred, 0);
+ WARN_ON(in_interrupt());
if (deferred) {
while (--deferred)
@@ -1460,7 +1461,6 @@ void net_enable_timestamp(void)
return;
}
#endif
- WARN_ON(in_interrupt());
jump_label_inc(&netstamp_needed);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(net_enable_timestamp);
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists