netdev - Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111130044403.GY15008@game.jcrosoft.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:44:03 +0100
From:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	nicolas.ferre@...el.com, jamie@...ieiles.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line

On 18:53 Tue 29 Nov     , David Miller wrote:
> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:21:14 +0100
> 
> > Use the generic gpiolib gpio_is_valid() function to test
> > if the phy IRQ line GPIO is actually provided.
> > 
> > For non-connected or non-existing phy IRQ lines, -EINVAL
> > value is used for phy_irq_pin field of struct at91_eth_data.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> 
> I'm assuming this goes through the ARM tree, because in both of my networking
> trees there is no ARM at91 implementation of gpio_is_valid().
yes the depending patch series is in the arm-soc

can we have your ack or sob?

Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html