[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322631613.2596.70.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 06:40:13 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Rick Jones <raj@...dy.cup.hp.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] Include selection of congestion control
algorithm in that which is inherited across an accept() call
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011 à 06:21 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> So my suggestion would be to use this two lines patch instead :
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> index 945efff..6b066e2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> @@ -495,8 +495,6 @@ struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> newtp->frto_counter = 0;
> newtp->frto_highmark = 0;
>
> - newicsk->icsk_ca_ops = &tcp_init_congestion_ops;
> -
> tcp_set_ca_state(newsk, TCP_CA_Open);
> tcp_init_xmit_timers(newsk);
> skb_queue_head_init(&newtp->out_of_order_queue);
>
Please test this change and if its OK, resubmit your patch, with
appropriate Documentation change, as pointed out by Yuchung Cheng
(file to change : Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt )
You could clearly state that the congestion control eventually
chosen by the listener socket takes precedence over the system default
tcp congestion value.
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists