[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1111301004440.18890@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:07:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Krzysztof Olędzki <ole@....pl>
cc: Ulrich Weber <ulrich.weber@...hos.com>,
Amos Jeffries <squid3@...enet.co.nz>,
"sclark46@...thlink.net" <sclark46@...thlink.net>,
"kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] netfilter: IPv6 NAT
On Wednesday 2011-11-30 01:21, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
>>>
>>>>>However with NAT you could get some kind of anonymity.
>>>
>>>But without NAT you have pretty big chance to have the same IPv6
>>>*suffix* everywhere, based on you MAC address. without NAT you have
>>>pretty big chance to have the same IPv6 *suffix* everywhere, based on
>>>you MAC address.
>>
>>Same suffix? Certainly not with [PrivExt...]
>
>What if:
>
>1. You or your users don't have modern OS on your device so there is no
>DHCPv6 or rfc3041/4941 support?
Dedicated separate program (that's what you would probably do on
Windows XP which lacks DHCPv6, PrivExt and also does not even allow
manually setting an address via GUI).
>3. You need to have static addresses in your network for access control?
Access control can be done based on MAC within a broadcast domain so
you don't have to eschew Privacy Extensions if you can do so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists