[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111201.144650.173157123252154314.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:46:50 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk, gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk
Subject: [PATCH] dccp: Fix compile warning in probe code.
Commit 1386be55e32a3c5d8ef4a2b243c530a7b664c02c ("dccp: fix
auto-loading of dccp(_probe)") fixed a bug but created a new
compiler warning:
net/dccp/probe.c: In function ‘dccpprobe_init’:
net/dccp/probe.c:166:2: warning: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be ‘true’, suggest explicit middle operand [-Wparentheses]
try_then_request_module() is built for situations where the
"existence" test is some lookup function that returns a non-NULL
object on success, and with a reference count of some kind held.
Here we're looking for a success return of zero from the jprobe
registry.
Instead of fighting the way try_then_request_module() works, simply
open code what we want to happen in a local helper function.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
net/dccp/probe.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dccp/probe.c b/net/dccp/probe.c
index 33d0e62..0a8d6eb 100644
--- a/net/dccp/probe.c
+++ b/net/dccp/probe.c
@@ -152,6 +152,17 @@ static const struct file_operations dccpprobe_fops = {
.llseek = noop_llseek,
};
+static __init int setup_jprobe(void)
+{
+ int ret = register_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe);
+
+ if (ret) {
+ request_module("dccp");
+ ret = register_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
static __init int dccpprobe_init(void)
{
int ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -163,8 +174,7 @@ static __init int dccpprobe_init(void)
if (!proc_net_fops_create(&init_net, procname, S_IRUSR, &dccpprobe_fops))
goto err0;
- try_then_request_module((ret = register_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe)) == 0,
- "dccp");
+ ret = setup_jprobe();
if (ret)
goto err1;
--
1.7.7.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists