[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322770844.2750.1.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:20:44 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
000000000000002c
Le jeudi 01 décembre 2011 à 13:23 -0500, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:11:51PM +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i'm not quite sure if this is an XFS thing or a tcp thing. As the
> > stacktrace confuses me a little but as it contains
> > xfs_bmap_search_extents and xfs_iunlock. Kernel is 3.0.11 running as
> > 2.6.40.11.
> >
> > [171464.091567] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
> > dereference at 000000000000002c
> > [171464.092073] IP: [<ffffffff815494f6>] ipv4_dst_check+0xb6/0x190
> > [171464.092073] PGD 15344e067 PUD 14c821067 PMD 0
> > [171464.092073] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
> >
> > Full Stacktrace:
> > http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=QNg6jD2t
>
> The ? entries mean even the backtrace code things they are unreliable,
> and mos of the cases I've seen they are wrong. In this case it looks
> like the process was doing XFS work before, but the current system call
> indeed is purely in the networking code.
>
> I've changed the cc list to the netdev list which is more appropinquate.
Probably fixed by commit 81d54ec8479a2c695760da
(net: fix NULL dereferences in check_peer_redir())
But this patch needs some followup patches (some of them in David net
tree, not yet in Linus tree)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists