[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61abe6ff1aa870d1b885ce88814920d4@localhost>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:36:56 +0100
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] netem: add cell concept to simulate special MAC behavior
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:01:48 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Yes :)
damn!
> I want to be able to use netem on a 10Gigabit link, and simulate a 5ms
> delay. I already will hit the shared qdisc bottleneck, dont force me to
> use small packets !
No I don't want that. But with 10Gb/s links you will have packet
scheduling problems anyway - if you focus on an _accurate_ delay. A static
delay differs from rate shaping in use case. In the later we (and probably
you) want a exact/realistic spacing between packets.
Due to timer and scheduling granularity somewhere in between 1bit/s and
10Gb/s netem rate (and tbf) will not scale anymore. You will see burst and
inaccurate spacings, far away from what you want to emulate. For us we want
a realistic and clean behavior, if the result of the emulation is not
identical to the emulated link/device we cannot use it (some background
information).
Anyway: I was not sure what solution you prefer - for us both are
identical. That's why I presented two solutions, so you can pick up the
favorite one. I will re-code the calculation using a reciprocal divide.
Thanks Eric!
Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists