[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111202.131304.981034697414242002.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:13:04 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: subramanian.vijay@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug in computing data_len in tcp_sendmsg?
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:05:35 +0100
> Le vendredi 02 décembre 2011 à 16:44 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>
>> [PATCH net-next] tcp: fix tcp_trim_head()
>>
>> commit f07d960df3 (tcp: avoid frag allocation for small frames)
>> breaked assumption in tcp stack that skb is either linear (data_len ==
>> 0), either fully fragged (data_len == len)
>>
>> Thanks to Vijay for providing a very detailed explanation.
>>
>> Reported-by: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> ---
>
> Another problem is the possible misalignement of skb->data if/when we
> receive an ACK of an odd (not a 4 multiple) tcp sequence.
>
> So when/if packet is restransmited, tcp header (and IP header as well)
> could be misaligned.
>
> Hmm, I probably miss something obvious, since this problem could happen
> for linear skbs before my patch ?
Unfortunately, even if netfilter or the packet scheduler pulled data, this
misalignment wouldn't happen before your change.
Maybe we should revert your frag allocation avoidance change until we can
sort this out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists