netdev - Re: SYN attack, with FIN flag set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1322897233.2762.79.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Sat, 03 Dec 2011 08:27:13 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SYN attack, with FIN flag set

Le samedi 03 décembre 2011 à 00:29 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko a écrit :
> Hi
> 
>  Recently i started to get SYN attacks, and managed them.
>  syncookies didn't helped, here is "perf report" info:
>  -     26.89%        swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] _raw_spin_lock
>     - _raw_spin_lock
>        - 94.97% tcp_v4_rcv
>             ip_local_deliver_finish
>             ip_local_deliver
>             ip_rcv_finish
>             ip_rcv
>             __netif_receive_skb
>             process_backlog
>             net_rx_action
>             __do_softirq
>             call_softirq
>             do_softirq
>           + irq_exit
> 
>  But then i got attack that made server to choke and bypassed "--syn" 
>  rule, and i was surprised, that stack are handling invalid combination 
>  of flags, SYN+FIN.
>  Is it valid behaviour?
> 
>  in tcp_input.c, tcp_rcv_state_process(), it just does check for rst (to 
>  discard), but maybe packet with fin set should be discarded too?

I believe netfilter tcp conntrack considers SYN|FIN as INVALID

Yes, we could drop SYN|FIN messages, but what prevents attacker to just
use SYN messages to attack your machine ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html