lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1323072138.24828.32.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date:	Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:02:17 -0800
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
	"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 1/6] e1000e: Avoid wrong check on TX hang

On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 23:15 -0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 02:25 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 17:05 -0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> >> On 12/04/2011 03:28 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 19:26 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >>>> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> >>>> Date: Sat,  3 Dec 2011 03:44:26 -0800
> >>>>
> >>>>> +	if ((!adapter->tx_hang_recheck) &&
> >>>>
> >>>> Excessive parenthesis, please remove.
> >>>>
> >>>>> +		adapter->tx_hang_recheck = 1;
> >>>>
> >>>> This variable is a bool, set it to true or false.
> >>>>
> >>>>> +			adapter->tx_hang_recheck = 0;
> >>>>
> >>>> Likewise.
> >>>>
> >>>>> +	adapter->tx_hang_recheck = 0;
> >>>>
> >>>> Likewise.
> >>>
> >>> Michael/Flavio -
> >>>
> >>> To expedite this patch, I can make the changes that Dave is requesting
> >>> and re-submit v2 of the patch, if that is ok with you.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi, Jeff
> >>
> >> That's ok for me, I think it's good if you can work with Dave and make
> >> out a final version for us, if you want my help, please mail me at any
> >> time, I'm glad to work with you.
> >>
> >> Flavio:
> >> What's your opinion?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Michael Wang
> > 
> > I have the patch read to push, so I will go ahead an push v2 out
> > tonight.  Since I am making changes to your patch, I will be removing
> > your signed-off-by (and Flavio's) and keep you as a CC: so that you can
> > verify the changes I have made to resolve the issues that Dave saw.
> > 
> 
> Hi, Jeff
> 
> Is that means you have a better patch which different from ours, and you
> will use your patch to instead of ours?
> 
> Because David is just ask for some small change, I think your time zone
> may be better to work with him, so I ask for your help.
> 
> I was just confused that why our signed-off-by should be removed?
> 
> Thanks,
> Michael Wang
> 
> > Cheers,
> > Jeff

It is your patch (your original work) but since I have made changes to
your patch, I (or anyone for that matter) should not assume that you as
the owner would signed off on the changes that I have made based on
feedback.  It would not be right for me to send out a patch with your
signed-off-by which is different from what you originally submitted,
without your ok.  Once I send out the v2 of the patch, please feel free
to add your signed-off-by OR acked-by to the patch.

While I personally do not have a problem keeping you as the owner and
your signed-off-by, I believe that takes in several assumptions which
only you as the owner should speak for.  I am not trying to take
ownership for stats purposes, I care less about the number of patches I
create and own and would rather make sure that the original owners get
the credit due for the work they did.

So with that, when I send out my next series of patches please feel free
to ACK or Sign-off on the changes made.  I just wanted to make sure that
we get these changes in soon (with out delay).

I can wait if you want to keep ownership of the patch, I just wanted to
ensure that we get your patch included as soon as possible based on the
problem it fixes.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ