netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] remove an outdated reference to T/TCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111206.164243.402402261622724566.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:42:43 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rick.jones2@...com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] remove an outdated reference to T/TCP

From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:39:23 -0800

> On 12/06/2011 12:19 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Rick Jones<rick.jones2@...com>
>> Date: Tue,  6 Dec 2011 12:00:05 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>>
>>> Remove a particularly out of date bit of comment referring to T/TCP.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rick Jones<rick.jones2@...com>
>>
>> I think it should stay because it discusses the potential bad side
>> effects of queueing any data that might be in the SYN.
> 
> How about just the sentence that mentioned T/TCP explicitly since
> T/TCP is most definitely no longer starting to be used?-) The rest of
> it can be discussed when/if TCP Fast Open arrives :)

T/TCP gives the statement context, as in referencing something that
might make us want to at least theoretically consider handling the
data.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html