netdev - Shaping TCP ACK packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7cf7b0f6-b30f-465a-9e50-20bd2c31bbe9@jasiiieee>
Date:	Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:18:03 -0500 (EST)
From:	"John A. Sullivan III" <jsullivan@...nsourcedevel.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Shaping TCP ACK packets

Hello, all.  I've seen several sites recommend prioritizing TCP ACK packets using tc.  Is that a good idea? I have two reservations:

1) If my line is congested, isn't delaying ACKs a good way to slow down the conversation? Accelerating ACKs under congestion sounds a bit like stuffing more food in my mouth when I'm already choking.

2) By messing with normal coordination of TCP, do I risk making a mess.  Specifically, can I create problems with out of order packet delivery - send an ACK before the packet which should have preceded it? I suppose in a well behaved protocol that wouldn't happen but I'm not sure.  Thanks - John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html