[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1323295271.12793.1.camel@pasglop>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:01:11 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
socketcan-users@...ts.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] powerpc: tqm8548/tqm8xx: add and update
CAN device nodes
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:25 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > Also there have been at least 3 versions in a couple of days already
> > without comments nor indication of what was changed...
>
> Unfortunately, no response from those sub-system guys.
>
> > Can you clarify things a bit please ? It looks like they really should
> > go to linuxppc-dev (and you can probably drop a bunch of other lists) or
> > am I missing an important piece of the puzzle ? (Such as patch 1/4 and
> > 2/4 ...)
>
> I have not sent the whole series. The changes are documented in the
> cover-letter, which I have not sent for those patches. Well, I think
> it's better to sent the whole series to all parties instead?
Well at least for linuxppc-dev, don't bother now that I know what this
is about :-)
> > Let me know if I should just remove them from powerpc patchwork.
>
> Dave has already applied all patches.
>
> Sorry for the confusion. Any advice on how to handle multi subsystem
> series of patches properly is welcome.
No specific advice. Ideally, if patchwork could track cover letters it
would help but I don't see a non-nasty way to do it so ... :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists