[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111207072050.GC2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 07:20:50 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"wangyunlinux@...il.com" <wangyunlinux@...il.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] e1000e: Assign true and false to bool type variable
instead of 1 and 0
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 12/07/2011 02:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
[snip]
> > if (*i2cctl & IXGBE_I2C_DATA_IN)
> > - data = 1;
> > + data = true;
> > else
> > - data = 0;
> > + data = false;
> >
> > return data;
Yuck...
bool f(whatever)
{
bool data;
if (expression)
data = true;
else
data = false;
return data;
}
is amazingly unidiomatic. Hell, if nothing else it's
bool data = expression;
return data;
if not an outright
return expression;
or
return (bool)expression;
if you want to underline that it's treated as boolean... What tool
has produced that patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists