netdev - Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:46:17 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, krkumar2@...ibm.com,
	arnd@...db.de, levinsasha928@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get_queue to use rxhash first

On 12/08/2011 12:10 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Krishna Kumar2<krkumar2@...ibm.com>
>> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
>>
>>> Jason Wang<jasowang@...hat.com>  wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
>>>> My description is not clear again :(
>>>> I mean the same vhost thead:
>>>>
>>>> vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
>>>> ...
>>>> vhost thread #0 move to another process N and start to transmit packets
>>>> of flow A
>>> Thanks for clarifying. Yes, binding vhosts to CPU's
>>> makes the incoming packet go to the same vhost each
>>> time. BTW, are you doing any binding and/or irqbalance
>>> when you run your tests? I am not running either at
>>> this time, but thought both might be useful.
>> So are we going with this patch or are we saying that vhost binding
>> is a requirement?
> OK we didn't come to a conclusion so I would be inclined
> to merge this patch as is for 3.2, and revisit later.
> One question though: do these changes affect userspace
> in any way? For example, will this commit us to
> ensure that a single flow gets a unique hash even
> for strange configurations that transmit the same flow
> from multiple cpus?
>
The hash were generated by either host kernel or host nic, so I think 
it's unique except for the nic that would provide different hashes for a 
flow. I wonder whether there's a such nic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html