netdev - Re: TCP fast retransmit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1323448264.5661.3.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date:	Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:31:04 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Esztermann, Ansgar" <Ansgar.Esztermann@...-bpc.mpg.de>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP fast retransmit

Le vendredi 09 décembre 2011 à 17:17 +0100, Esztermann, Ansgar a écrit :
> On Dec 9, 2011, at 15:43 , Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> > It seems you have a lot of packet reorders.
> > 
> > Are you using multipath or some channel bonding ?
> 
> Not that I am aware of (i.e. not on our end). However, the connection
> will probably routed through a firewall. I will have to check if it is
> configured to avoid reordering.
> 

Is it a linux based firewall ?

I suspect this firewall terminates a tunnel ?

If so, make sure network interrupts are handled by the same cpu.

(because tunneling means calling netif_rx() : This can be the reason for
Out Of Order packets, if next hardware interrupt is delivered to another
cpu)

We really should call netif_receive_skb() for the first tunnel level to
avoid this...



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html