| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1323540988.3159.133.camel@denise.theartistscloset.com> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:16:28 -0500 From: "John A. Sullivan III" <jsullivan@...nsourcedevel.com> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Optimizing tc filters Hello, all. Given that there are several ways to direct packets into the appropriate queue, I was wondering which ways are generally more efficient. There seem to be a number of email discussions but nothing authoritative. From those discussions, it would seem that for most corporate usage (as in more traffic than a home user) we would have from most efficient to least efficient: 1) Mark the connection with CONNMARK and us --restore-mark to mark all packets in the connection for classification via an fw filter 2) Use the iptables CLASSIFY target 3) u32 filter 4) Mark individual packets and use an fw filter - one email thread says this is more efficient than #3 Is this correct? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists