| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1323566146.3159.186.camel@denise.theartistscloset.com> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:15:46 -0500 From: "John A. Sullivan III" <jsullivan@...nsourcedevel.com> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: IFB and bridges Hello, all. This is more an "out of curiosity" question. I'm starting to build a test environment for all I've learned about Linux traffic shaping over the last week. One of the devices happens to be configured as a bridge. It quickly became apparent that I needed to do shaping on the individual ports and not the bridge port. This would be a real pain if I have lots of ports - 8 or 10 or 20 identical configurations. Would this be an ideal use for IFB? That is, to redirect all ports to IFB and apply one set qdiscs/classes? Thanks - John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists