netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] cdc_ether: allow vendor specific data interface if control interface is vendor specific

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87vcplcbj3.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date:	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:59:12 +0100
From:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cdc_ether: allow vendor specific data interface if control interface is vendor specific

Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:

> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 05:33 +0100, Bjorn Mork wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c b/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c
> []
>> @@ -211,8 +211,12 @@ int usbnet_generic_cdc_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
> []
>> -				dev_dbg(&intf->dev, "slave class %u\n",
> []
>> +				dev_dbg(&intf->dev, "xslave class %u\n",
>
> Why change the output from slave to xslave?

That was unintentional.  Sorry.  Don't understand how checkpatch could
have missed that :-)

Will fix and submit again, unless there are objections to the actual
code change.



Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html