netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] cdc_ether: allow vendor specific data interface if control interface is vendor specific

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:39:08 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
CC:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cdc_ether: allow vendor specific data interface if
 control interface is vendor specific

Hello.

On 13-12-2011 8:59, Bjørn Mork wrote:

>> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 05:33 +0100, Bjorn Mork wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c b/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c
>> []
>>> @@ -211,8 +211,12 @@ int usbnet_generic_cdc_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
>> []
>>> -				dev_dbg(&intf->dev, "slave class %u\n",
>> []
>>> +				dev_dbg(&intf->dev, "xslave class %u\n",
>>
>> Why change the output from slave to xslave?
>
> That was unintentional.  Sorry.  Don't understand how checkpatch could
> have missed that :-)

    Don't understand what checkpatch.pl would have to do with that. :-)

WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html