Message-ID: <20111213142114.GB2702@minipsycho>
Date:	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:21:15 +0100
From:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To:	Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...n-fcoe.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also

Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:08:52AM CET, vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:56 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: 
>> Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:19:23PM CET, vasu.dev@...el.com wrote:
>> >The orig_dev has to be updated before going another round
>> >for vlan pkts, otherwise currently unmodified real orig_dev
>> >causes vlan pkt delivered to real orig_dev also.
>> >
>> >The fcoe stack doesn't expects its vlan pkts on real dev
>> >and it causes crash in fcoe stack.
>> 
>> Could you please provide more info on where exactly it would crash and
>> why?
>
>Its in fcoe stack due to its fip rx skb list getting corrupt as same skb
>instance getting queued twice without being cloned, though list was well
>protected by its spin lock, it was queued on its two fcoe instances, one
>on real dev and other on its vlan.
>
>I could also handle this gracefully in fcoe stack by cloning but any
>case netdev should not forward vlan pkt to its read dev pkt handler also
>and that is getting fixed with this patch, so patch will restore
>orig_dev uses for *only* vlan pkts as it was with recursive
>__netif_receive_skb calling prior to commit 0dfe178.


I do not see into fcoe code, but wouldn't it be good to do skb
skb_share_check in fcoe_ctlr_recv? I suppose that would solve your
problem and looks legal to me.


>
>Here is the detailed crash log:
>
>[  340.679591] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
>0000000000000008
>[  340.680112] IP: [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90
>[  340.680112] PGD 0
>[  340.680112] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>[  340.680112] CPU 3
>[  340.680112] Modules linked in: fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc
>8021q e1000 virtio_balloon ixgbe mdio virtio_blk virtio_pci virtio_ring
>virtio [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
>[  340.680112]
>[  340.680112] Pid: 442, comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 3.2.0-rc4+ #53
>Bochs Bochs
>[  340.680112] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815088a5>]  [<ffffffff815088a5>]
>skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90
>[  340.680112] RSP: 0018:ffff88007c963c80  EFLAGS: 00010097
>[  340.680112] RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: ffff88007baee9b4 RCX:
>0000000000000000
>[  340.680112] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000286 RDI:
>ffff88007baee9b4
>[  340.680112] RBP: ffff88007c963ca0 R08: ffff88007c35ddc0 R09:
>0000000000000001
>[  340.680112] R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000001 R12:
>ffff88007bedca00
>[  340.680112] R13: ffff88007baee9a0 R14: ffff88007c963d80 R15:
>ffff88007baeea00
>[  340.680112] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007fd80000(0000)
>knlGS:0000000000000000
>[  340.680112] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>[  340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000001c05000 CR4:
>00000000000006e0
>[  340.680112] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
>0000000000000000
>[  340.680112] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
>0000000000000400
>[  340.680112] Process kworker/3:1 (pid: 442, threadinfo
>ffff88007c962000, task ffff88007c9f60b0)
>[  340.680112] Stack:
>[  340.680112]  ffff88007baee9a0 ffff88007baee8c0 ffff88007baee9a0
>ffff88007bedca00
>[  340.680112]  ffff88007c963df0 ffffffffa00af7a7 ffff88007baad4d4
>ffffffff81060dee
>[  340.680112]  0000000000000001 ffff88007c35ddc0 ffff88007c963fd8
>0000000000000000
>[  340.680112] Call Trace:
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffffa00af7a7>] fcoe_ctlr_recv_work+0x147/0x1870
>[libfcoe]
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffff81060dee>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x9e/0x170
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffffa00af660>] ? fcoe_ctlr_vn_recv+0x9a0/0x9a0
>[libfcoe]
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffff810612de>] process_one_work+0x11e/0x460
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffff81063af8>] worker_thread+0x178/0x400
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffff81063980>] ? manage_workers+0x210/0x210
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffff81068576>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffff81663c74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffff810684e0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x1a0/0x1a0
>[  340.680112]  [<ffffffff81663c70>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
>[  340.680112] Code: 65 00 4d 39 e5 74 4f 4d 85 e4 74 26 41 83 6d 10 01
>49 8b 0c 24 49 8b 54 24 08 49 c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 49 c7 44 24 08 00 00
>00 00
>[  340.680112]  89 51 08 48 89 0a 48 89 c6 48 89 df e8 39 1b 15 00 4c 89
>e0
>[  340.680112] RIP  [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90
>[  340.680112]  RSP <ffff88007c963c80>
>[  340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008
>
>
>
>Thanks
>Vasu
>
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Jirka
>> 
>> >
>> >This wasn't issue untill __netif_receive_skb recursive calling
>> >was removed with this commit 0dfe178, so this patch restores
>> >orig_dev uses as it was prior to that commit but still w/o
>> >recursive calling to __netif_receive_skb.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...el.com>
>> >---
>> >
>> > net/core/dev.c |    5 +++--
>> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>> >index f494675..adbcd7a 100644
>> >--- a/net/core/dev.c
>> >+++ b/net/core/dev.c
>> >@@ -3222,9 +3222,10 @@ ncls:
>> > 			ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev);
>> > 			pt_prev = NULL;
>> > 		}
>> >-		if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler))
>> >+		if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) {
>> >+			orig_dev = skb->dev;
>> > 			goto another_round;
>> >-		else if (unlikely(!skb))
>> >+		} else if (unlikely(!skb))
>> > 			goto out;
>> > 	}
>> > 
>> >
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists