[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201112131559.17969.carsten@wolffcarsten.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:59:17 +0100
From: Carsten Wolff <carsten@...ffcarsten.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "Esztermann, Ansgar" <Ansgar.Esztermann@...-bpc.mpg.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP fast retransmit
On Tuesday 13 December 2011, you wrote:
> Le mardi 13 décembre 2011 à 15:05 +0100, Esztermann, Ansgar a écrit :
> > On Dec 9, 2011, at 17:31 , Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >>> It seems you have a lot of packet reorders.
> > >>>
> > >>> Are you using multipath or some channel bonding ?
> > >>
> > >> Not that I am aware of (i.e. not on our end). However, the connection
> > >> will probably routed through a firewall. I will have to check if it is
> > >> configured to avoid reordering.
> > >
> > > Is it a linux based firewall ?
> >
> > No, it's Cisco.
>
> OK
>
> You could increase /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_reordering from 3 to 16
>
> (Not sure it will change anything, since its kinda dynamic for a tcp
> session)
It's dynamic, but the sysctl changes the dynamic a lot, because its the
minimum value of the dupack threshold. Be sure not to set this too high, or
you will risk a lot of RTOs, which should kill performance even more
thoroughly.
Carsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists