lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:55:23 -0800
From:	Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Nicolas de Peslo√ľan 
	<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
Cc:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...el.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...n-fcoe.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also

On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 20:52 +0100, Nicolas de Peslo√ľan wrote:
> If a protocol handler is registered on a particular device (instead of
> NULL), then the handler will 
> receive whatever is received on this device. This is true for bridge,
> for bonding and probably for 
> all other "stackable" devices. I don't see any reason to handle it in
> a different way for vlan.
> 

Yeah okay to have orig_dev pkt handler see its all vlan frames though we
didn't have that way until recent change but seems reasonable to have
this way now. So I'll fix fcoe by allowing frames matching to its own
device and that will exclude vlan frames on its orig_dev pkt handler.

However now each stacked vlan tag iteration would result in passing up
frame to its orig_dev pkt handler but don't know if that affects other
and anyway fcoe would be okay with that as well.

Thanks
Vasu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists