[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0BF79838-C86F-4C3F-8D51-4223D579764C@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:13:28 -0500
From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <andrei@...el.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: fix incorrect overflow check on autoclose
On Dec 15, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> I think it would be better to keep this value in seconds and get rid
> of division in the setsockopt code. We could then have a min and max
> values where max value could be something like 2 days. I really don't
> see an autoclose value that is bigger then that being very useful. In
> fact, most of the time these values are very small as one wants to close
> out idle associations.
Now I start to think exposing a new sysctl option might be a little
overkill since autoclose is often small.
How about this?
1) Simply store autoclose in seconds in setsockopt.
2) Avoid overflow in associola.c.
asoc->timeouts[SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_AUTOCLOSE] =
(sp->autoclose > MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ)
? MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT
: (unsigned long)sp->autoclose * HZ;
Or we could use INT_MAX instead of MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT if you want to
keep that value consistent across 32/64 bits.
- xi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists