lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:20:50 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from
 memcontrol.c

On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:13:16 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:34:32 +0400
> Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
> 
> > Walking the proto_list holds a read_lock, which prevents us from doing
> > allocations. Splitting the tcp create function into create + init is
> > good, but it is not enough since create_files will do allocations as well
> > (dentry ones, mostly).
> > 
> > Since this does not involve any protocol state, I propose we call the tcp
> > functions explicitly from memcontrol.c
> > 
> > With this, we lose by now the ability of doing cgroup memcontrol for
> > protocols that are loaded as modules. But at least the ones I have in mind
> > won't really need it (tcp_ipv6 being the only one, but it uses the same data
> > structures as tcp_ipv4). So I believe this to be the simpler solution to this
> > problem.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> > CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> > CC: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> 
> Could you remake the patch onto the 'latest' linux-next ?
> As Dave mentioned, some bandaids are already applied and this patch hunks.

Applied patches by hand and did small test for hours.
seems good.

Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists