| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:58:01 -0800 From: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com> To: Vincent Bernat <bernat@...fy.cx> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: nonlocal_bind and IPv6 why not simply use the IP_TRANSPARENT or IP_FREEBIND socket options? On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:20, Vincent Bernat <bernat@...fy.cx> wrote: > This is a second tentative to port ip_nonlocal_bind to IPv6. The two > patches are independant. The first patch enables > net.ipv6.ip_nonlocal_bind and is "namespace aware". The second patch > modifies net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind to also be "namespace aware". I > don't know if this is something important. > > I did not test the SCTP part of the second patch (but it compiles). > > Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt | 5 +++++ > include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 1 + > include/net/netns/ipv6.h | 1 + > net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 6 +----- > net/ipv4/ping.c | 2 +- > net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 16 +++++++++------- > net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 6 ++++-- > net/ipv6/sysctl_net_ipv6.c | 8 ++++++++ > net/sctp/protocol.c | 2 +- > 9 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists