netdev - Re: skb->priority usage in wireless frame classification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA93jw4-OEbiSpQM+SJn7R0uAe0o-nw0kwgvjVkL4w4AeWQtjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:35:51 +0100
From:	Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
To:	Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: skb->priority usage in wireless frame classification

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Helmut Schaa
<helmut.schaa@...glemail.com> wrote:
> [Adding netdev]
>
> Maybe someone from the netdev people can shed some light on this.
> We've got the following code in net/wireless/util.c for frame classification
> (cfg80211_classify8021d):
>
> /* skb->priority values from 256->263 are magic values to
> * directly indicate a specific 802.1d priority.  This is used
> * to allow 802.1d priority to be passed directly in from VLAN
> * tags, etc.
> */
> if (skb->priority >= 256 && skb->priority <= 263)
>                  return skb->priority - 256;
>
> I was just thinking about making use of this for some internal mac80211
> QoS handling. But is this code still valid? At least I haven't found anything
> in the 802.1q code :(

I made use of the above 'feature' while prototyping some Diffserv work
with iptables. I have no idea if there are users of this obscure
overloading of priority in userspace....

The vlan code at least used to do something like this:

net/8021q/vlan.h: *	@vlan_qos: vlan priority: (skb->priority << 13) & 0xE000

But I don't see that at first glance in the current code... this part
is functionally the same...

vlan_netlink.c:				m.to   = (pm->vlan_qos >> 13) & 0x7;
vlanproc.c:				   mp->priority, ((mp->vlan_qos >> 13) & 0x7));

Assuming that somewhere else was an assignment from priority to this...

> Thanks,
> Helmut
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
FR Tel: 0638645374
http://www.bufferbloat.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html