[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111216111027.GA2315@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:10:27 +0100
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Vincent Bernat <bernat@...fy.cx>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, zenczykowski@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: nonlocal_bind and IPv6
Vincent Bernat <bernat@...fy.cx> :
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:06:00 -0500 (EST), David Miller wrote:
> >>04:58, Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com> disait :
[...]
> >>>why not simply use the IP_TRANSPARENT or IP_FREEBIND socket
> >>>options?
> >>
> >>Because this requires modifying each affected software. This
> >>can be difficult if you don't have the source code available.
> >
> >But it means that it would work on every single kernel verion out
> >there.
[...]
> Moreover, I am just adding the IPv6 version of this setting. The
> IPv4 version already exists.
For IPv6 this is adding a system-scope function which will have to be
maintained and available for ages. It will compete with the existing,
per-application answer. The "fix you application / design" argument
is thus stronger than with IPv4.
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists