[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EED6F39.2030601@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:42:33 -0500
From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@...too.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: meth: Some code cleanups for meth
On 12/17/2011 22:00, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@...too.org>
> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 20:27:42 -0500
>
>> -#define WAIT_FOR_PHY(___rval) \
>> - while ((___rval = mace->eth.phy_data) & MDIO_BUSY) { \
>> - udelay(25); \
>> +#define WAIT_FOR_PHY(___rval) \
>> + while ((___rval = mace->eth.phy_data) & MDIO_BUSY) { \
>> + udelay(25); \
>
> I think using tabs at the end of the line to line up the "\" is much
> better than what you're changing it to, that being spaces.
Mistake from when I still had my editor switched to spaces mode. I set it
to tab mode a little bit later and didn't think to go back and correct this.
>> - priv->phy_addr=i;
>> - p2=mdio_read(priv,2);
>> - p3=mdio_read(priv,3);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++){
>> + priv->phy_addr = i;
>> + p2 = mdio_read(priv,2);
>> + p3 = mdio_read(priv,3);
>
> If you're going to put forth the effort to put spaces around the
> "=" characters, fix up the arguments to mdio_read() as well, there
> needs to be a space after the "," and right before the second
> argument.
>
It's not that it took a lot of effort, I just simply missed the space after
the comma. It still looks better :)
>> + if ((p2 != 0xffff) && (p2 != 0x0000)) {
>
> There is no need for the new parenthesis you are adding here. It
> doesn't change things semantically, and it does not improve
> readability, it just makes for more characters a human has to parse in
> his mind.
>
It's a habit -- I blame math from grade school years ago. I'll remove them
in the next version.
>> - * Copyright (C) 2001 Alessandro Rubini and Jonathan Corbet
>> - * Copyright (C) 2001 O'Reilly & Associates
>> + * Copyright (C) 2001-2003 Ilya Volynets
>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Joshua Kinard
>> *
>> - * The source code in this file can be freely used, adapted,
>> - * and redistributed in source or binary form, so long as an
>> - * acknowledgment appears in derived source files. The citation
>> - * should list that the code comes from the book "Linux Device
>> - * Drivers" by Alessandro Rubini and Jonathan Corbet, published
>> - * by O'Reilly & Associates. No warranty is attached;
>> - * we cannot take responsibility for errors or fitness for use.
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
>> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
>> + * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> */
>
> I'm not sure at all that you have the ability to make this kind of
> change to the copyright and attributions here.
Looking at the header file, I really cannot find anything that would bear in
common with sample code from a book. If it was an actual driver file,
maybe. But a header file containing specific definitions for hardware bits?
I tracked down the first commit back in 2001 and put in the guy who
initially submitted it. Is there a better way to handle this? I doubt that
book had SGI O2 MACE Ethernet-specific defines in it.
> There are probably a lot more problems with this patch, but I'm
> exhausted look at this stuff as-is.
Probably :)
--
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
kumba@...too.org
4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28
"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And
our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."
--Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists