netdev - Re: [PATCH 01/11] SYSCTL: export root and set handling routines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EEEFC54.10700@parallels.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:56:52 +0400
From:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	"Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] SYSCTL: export root and set handling routines

18.12.2011 02:25, Eric W. Biederman пишет:
> Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@...allels.com>  writes:
>
>> These routines are required for making SUNRPC sysctl's per network namespace
>> context.
>
> Why does sunrpc require it's own sysctl root?  You should be able to use
> the generic per network namespace root and call it good.
>
> What makes register_net_sysctl_table and register_net_sysctl_ro_table
> unsuitable for sunrpc.  I skimmed through your patches and I haven't
> seen anything obvious.
>
> Eric
>

Hello, Eric. Sorry for the lack of information.
I was considering two ways how to make these sysctl per net ns:

1) Use register_net_sysctl_table and register_net_sysctl_ro_table as you 
mentioned. This was easy and cheap, but also means, than all user-space 
programs, tuning SUNRPC will be broken (since all sysctl currently located 
in"/proc/sys/sunprc/").

2) Export sysctl root creation routines and make per-net SUNRPC sysctl root. 
This approach allows to make any part of sysctl tree per namespace context and 
thus leave user-space stuff unchanged.

BTW, NFS and LockD also have it's sysctls ("/proc/sys/fs/nfs/").
And also because of them I've decided, that it would be better to export SYSCTL 
root creation routines instead of breaking compatibility for all NFS layers by 
moving all sysctl under /proc/sys/net/ directory.

Do you feel that it was a bad decision?

>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@...allels.com>
>>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/sysctl.h |    1 +
>>   kernel/sysctl.c        |   11 +++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sysctl.h
>> index 703cfa3..be586a9 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sysctl.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sysctl.h
>> @@ -1084,6 +1084,7 @@ struct ctl_path {
>>   };
>>
>>   void register_sysctl_root(struct ctl_table_root *root);
>> +void unregister_sysctl_root(struct ctl_table_root *root);
>>   struct ctl_table_header *__register_sysctl_paths(
>>   	struct ctl_table_root *root, struct nsproxy *namespaces,
>>   	const struct ctl_path *path, struct ctl_table *table);
>> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
>> index ae27196..fb016a9 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
>> @@ -1700,6 +1700,15 @@ void register_sysctl_root(struct ctl_table_root *root)
>>   	list_add_tail(&root->root_list,&sysctl_table_root.root_list);
>>   	spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
>>   }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_sysctl_root);
>> +
>> +void unregister_sysctl_root(struct ctl_table_root *root)
>> +{
>> +	spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
>> +	list_del(&root->root_list);
>> +	spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_sysctl_root);
>>
>>   /*
>>    * sysctl_perm does NOT grant the superuser all rights automatically, because
>> @@ -1925,6 +1934,7 @@ struct ctl_table_header *__register_sysctl_paths(
>>
>>   	return header;
>>   }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__register_sysctl_paths);
>>
>>   /**
>>    * register_sysctl_table_path - register a sysctl table hierarchy
>> @@ -2007,6 +2017,7 @@ void setup_sysctl_set(struct ctl_table_set *p,
>>   	p->parent = parent ? parent :&sysctl_table_root.default_set;
>>   	p->is_seen = is_seen;
>>   }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(setup_sysctl_set);
>>
>>   #else /* !CONFIG_SYSCTL */
>>   struct ctl_table_header *register_sysctl_table(struct ctl_table * table)
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html