lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:18:43 +0100
From:	Steffen Klassert <>
To:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: linux-3.0.x regression with ipv4 routes having mtu

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:03:55AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Timo Teräs <>
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:53:09 +0200
> > Or maybe I missed the place where that updated would happen?
> It should happen on every routing cache lookup hit just like we
> validate the peer for redirect information.

The problem is that we need to do a route cache lookup to
validate the peer informations. This does not happen if
somebody adds a new route. I tried already to add a pmtu specific
generation id and it appears to not solve the problem. We would
still need to overwrite the cached value if we add a route with mtu.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists