netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/8] farsync: Fix confusion about DMA address and buffer offset types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111220.234834.1265302793309771407.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:48:34 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ben@...adent.org.uk
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] farsync: Fix confusion about DMA address and
 buffer offset types

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:42:26 +0000

> I accidentally left signing enabled for this one, which I had intended
> to disable since you've said that patchwork doesn't deal with
> signatures.  Except this looks OK on patchwork:
> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/132548/>.
> 
> If that also looks OK to you, is there any reason to avoid signing
> networking patches?

What do you mean exactly by "signing".

Do you mean simply the "Signed-off-by: " tag, which you should always
add to your own patches, or something else?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html