netdev - Re: ICMP packets - ll_temac with Microblaze

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111221.155520.1406613141134089105.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:55:20 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	monstr@...str.eu, john.williams@...alogix.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ICMP packets - ll_temac with Microblaze

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:11:44 +0100

> [PATCH net-next] net: relax rcvbuf limits
> 
> skb->truesize might be big even for a small packet.
> 
> Its even bigger after commit 87fb4b7b533 (net: more accurate skb
> truesize) and big MTU.
> 
> We should allow queueing at least one packet per receiver, even with a
> low RCVBUF setting.
> 
> Reported-by: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>

Applied to net-next, although I was tempted to put it into net.

We may end up backporting this into -stable at some point, we'll
see.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html