netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/8] farsync: Fix confusion about DMA address and buffer offset types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:41:39 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] farsync: Fix confusion about DMA address and buffer
 offset types

On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 23:48 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:42:26 +0000
> 
> > I accidentally left signing enabled for this one, which I had intended
> > to disable since you've said that patchwork doesn't deal with
> > signatures.  Except this looks OK on patchwork:
> > <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/132548/>.
> > 
> > If that also looks OK to you, is there any reason to avoid signing
> > networking patches?
> 
> What do you mean exactly by "signing".
> 
> Do you mean simply the "Signed-off-by: " tag, which you should always
> add to your own patches, or something else?

GPG signing.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Humans are not rational beings; they are rationalising beings.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)