[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1324470605.2728.42.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:30:05 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"jesse.brandeburg@...el.com" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] skb paged fragment destructors
Le mercredi 21 décembre 2011 à 11:18 +0000, Ian Campbell a écrit :
>
> An order 1 allocation is in multiples of PAGE_SIZE, isn't it, even
> though they happen to be contiguous?
Really an order-1 allocation allocates one page, a compound one.
>
> Or are you considering the possibility of kmalloc returning a super page
> of some description? Isn't that to some extent transparent to the caller
> who (assuming PAGE_SIZE 4096) doesn't know if kmalloc(16384) returned
> 4*4096 contiguous pages or 1*16384 page?
>
Its a part of a _single_ page, or the total of it.
Its mandatory, or else many drivers would break their DMA handling.
> Anyway I take your underlying point that 2*PAGE_SIZE is no kind of limit
> on the size of the linear region.
>
Sure, since net/unix/af_unix.c can happily allocate huge linear skbs, if
memory is not too fragmented of course...
(The stream unix socket limit their skbs to SKB_MAX_ALLOC (up to 4
pages), but datagram ones have no limit)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists